Menu
US government received wide domestic criticism for escalating trade frictions with China
By Hu Zexi from People’s Daily
The US government has received wide domestic criticism as it escalated trade friction with China, including the businessmen and experts from the Midwest who warned that Washington’s trade policy has hindered the regular cooperation between China and the US states.
The American business representatives expressed such concerns when attending the 2018 annual gala hosted by the China General Chamber of Commerce -Chicago recently.
Business development manager Allen Williams of Iowa Economic Development Authority said that the sharp fall of soybean prices due to the trade war has caused loss for Iowan farmers, and many of them were diverting to other crops.
The trade friction brought uncertainties for enterprises, said Colin Renk, executive director of America China Society of Indiana.
Many enterprises established factories or supply chains in China as early as in the 1980s, he noted, adding that these enterprises would like to see an end of the trade war and hope the two governments to solve problems through conversation.
Many representatives agreed that the trade friction will bring negative effects to China-US cooperation, and a considerable number of enterprises would miss development opportunities.
The uncertainty was a major issue brought by China-US trade friction, said Jim Brady, chief operating officer of Grant Thornton, the world's sixth largest professional services network of independent accounting.
He explained that the uncertainty would impact enterprises’ investment decisions, which has already been indicated by the data of China-US two-way direct investment.
Stressing the vital importance of trade and investment to China-US ties, former US Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson believed that both China and the US have benefited from them.
He held that as consumption is rising to an increasingly powerful driver for China’s economic growth, it will make huge opportunities for American exporters in the long run.
In the eyes of the former Treasury Secretary, China is growing into a major investor, and is expected to create jobs for US communities.
Todd Buchholz, renowned economist and former White House Senior Economic Advisor illustrated the benefits brought to the US citizens by trade with China with his own experience.
The economist growing up in New Jersey recalled that there was no large-scale trade between China and the US in his childhood, and low- and middle-income families were always worried when they planned to buy winter coats for their children.
Thanks to the development of Chinese clothing industry and the trade channel established between stores like Walmart and China, the winter coat issue is never a problem again, according to him.
The negative impacts of the trade war would gradually show as time passes, Buchholz told People’s Daily, adding that it was hard to precisely estimate the damage and tell who would become the winner in the trade war.
Most of the states in the Midwest have established close trade and economic relations with China. Representatives from these states stressed that they will maintain their passion for cooperation with China no matter how the federal government alters its policies.
The American business representatives expressed such concerns when attending the 2018 annual gala hosted by the China General Chamber of Commerce -Chicago recently.
Business development manager Allen Williams of Iowa Economic Development Authority said that the sharp fall of soybean prices due to the trade war has caused loss for Iowan farmers, and many of them were diverting to other crops.
The trade friction brought uncertainties for enterprises, said Colin Renk, executive director of America China Society of Indiana.
Many enterprises established factories or supply chains in China as early as in the 1980s, he noted, adding that these enterprises would like to see an end of the trade war and hope the two governments to solve problems through conversation.
Many representatives agreed that the trade friction will bring negative effects to China-US cooperation, and a considerable number of enterprises would miss development opportunities.
The uncertainty was a major issue brought by China-US trade friction, said Jim Brady, chief operating officer of Grant Thornton, the world's sixth largest professional services network of independent accounting.
He explained that the uncertainty would impact enterprises’ investment decisions, which has already been indicated by the data of China-US two-way direct investment.
Stressing the vital importance of trade and investment to China-US ties, former US Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson believed that both China and the US have benefited from them.
He held that as consumption is rising to an increasingly powerful driver for China’s economic growth, it will make huge opportunities for American exporters in the long run.
In the eyes of the former Treasury Secretary, China is growing into a major investor, and is expected to create jobs for US communities.
Todd Buchholz, renowned economist and former White House Senior Economic Advisor illustrated the benefits brought to the US citizens by trade with China with his own experience.
The economist growing up in New Jersey recalled that there was no large-scale trade between China and the US in his childhood, and low- and middle-income families were always worried when they planned to buy winter coats for their children.
Thanks to the development of Chinese clothing industry and the trade channel established between stores like Walmart and China, the winter coat issue is never a problem again, according to him.
The negative impacts of the trade war would gradually show as time passes, Buchholz told People’s Daily, adding that it was hard to precisely estimate the damage and tell who would become the winner in the trade war.
Most of the states in the Midwest have established close trade and economic relations with China. Representatives from these states stressed that they will maintain their passion for cooperation with China no matter how the federal government alters its policies.
